Response: Dicamba is a selective, systemic, and plant growth regulator herbicide primarily used for post emergence broadleaf weed (for example, waterhemp, ragweed, horseweed) control in a variety of crops, residential areas, and other sites. Dicamba herbicide belongs to Group 4 site-of-action.
Response: Dicamba has long been used in agricultural and nonagricultural herbicide products. In 2016, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registered three products, XtendiMaxTM with VaporGripTM Technology (EPA Reg. No. 524-617, Monsanto), EngeniaTM (EPA Reg. No. 7969-345, BASF), and FeXapanTM with VaporGripTM Technology (EPA Reg. No. 352-913, DowDuPont) with a dicamba active ingredient . The EPA conditionally approved the post emergence use of these three new dicamba products on dicamba-tolerant (DT) soybeans until the end of 2018.
Reference to commercial products or trade names here or elsewhere on this site is made with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is implied.
Response: In Minnesota, waterhemp has evolved resistance to several herbicide classes (for example, glyphosate, ALS, PPO herbicides). In DT soybeans, growers can use these new tools in DT soybeans to control herbicide-resistant weeds such as waterhemp.
Response: Dicamba is a highly volatile chemical that can drift and/or volatilize. Dicamba drift can damage non-DT soybeans, other sensitive crops, and non-crop plants. Midwestern state agencies, including the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), received wide-spread reports of crop damage on large acreages of soybeans during the 2017 growing season. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture received numerous reports of dicamba related damage to non-target crops in 2017.
Response: New use restrictions have been put into place for dicamba use in 2018. First, there are new requirements and restrictions spelled out on the federal label. Second, the MDA has put forth additional label use restrictions when dicamba products are used in Minnesota. Finally, there requirements specified in the Minnesota Pesticide Control Law that all applicators must follow. A person that applies any of the new dicamba products must adhere to all legal requirements and restrictions.
Response: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) engaged state lead agencies, such as the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service and the pesticide manufacturers to find fixes that address the underlying causes leading to dicamba-related incidents of crop damage. The additional requirements and restrictions included on the federal label for the new dicamba products in 2018 are:
Applicators must always read and follow all label directions. It is a violation of federal label to use any new dicamba product in a manner inconsistent with the label.
Response: For Minnesota Section 24(c) dicamba labels with Minnesota-specific requirements, visit here:
Response: Each label for the new dicamba products specifies that applicators must attend training. Manufacturers will provide training that meets the requirements of the label. Information about dicamba use and training is available on the Minnesota Crop Production Retailers web page.
Each label for the new dicamba products also specifies content and a format for records that applicators must maintain for each application. Manufacturers may provide record-keeping templates that meet the requirements of the label.
Complying with each of these federal label requirements is mandatory.
Response: No, dicamba training is mandated only for those who use one of the new dicamba products.
Response: The Commissioner reviewed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s new restrictions and 2017 MDA dicamba survey results, and in consultation with the University of Minnesota, other experts, and dicamba manufacturers established the following restrictions on the use of new dicamba products in 2018 in Minnesota:
Response: The Commissioner set this cutoff date based on the review. The majority of Minnesota soybeans will still be in the vegetative growth stage by June 20. Research shows that non-DT (dicamba tolerant) soybeans in the vegetative stage are less affected by dicamba than those in the reproductive stage.
Response: Yes, new dicamba products can be applied on June 20 if other federal and state requirements are met (for example, field air temperature is below the 85 degrees Fahrenheit cutoff).
Response: The Commissioner set this cutoff temperature based on the review. Research shows that dicamba volatilization increases when temperatures are over 85 degrees.
Response: No, applicators may not apply dicamba when there is a prediction that the maximum air temperature of the day will exceed 85°F at any time during the day. For instance, a dicamba application is not permitted on a day when the air temperature is 75°F early in the day (after sunrise), but is predicted to exceed 85°F later in the same day.
Response: Yes, the actual or the predicted air temperature cannot exceed 85°F only on the day of application.
Response: Forecasts are available at the Local National Weather Service.
An additional local weather resource is MNDOT Scan WEB.
Response: MDA encourages dicamba applicators to visit the National Weather Service website to see the predicted timing of sunrise and sunset on that calendar day.
Response: Avoid dicamba applications when inversion conditions exist. The following are the indicators of presence of temperature inversion conditions:
Response: New dicamba products are classified as Restricted Use Pesticides (RUPs) and can only be used by applicators that are either certified as Private Pesticide Applicators or licensed as either Commercial or Noncommercial Pesticide Applicators and certified in Categories A (Core) and C (Field Crops) as required by the Minnesota Pesticide Control Law. The Pesticide Control Law does not allow uncertified applicators to use the new dicamba products or any RUPs under the supervision of certified applicators.
Response: In addition to licensing requirements, Commercial Noncommercial applicators must meet record keeping requirements specified in the Law. The MDA maintains samples of records on our web page that illustrate these requirements. Finally, Private Pesticide Applicators must meet the federally mandated record keeping requirements for Restricted Use Pesticides.
See a summary of applicator requirements.
Response: The MDA highly encourages growers to use preemergence herbicides with residual control and to follow resistance management strategies, such as:
For best control, post-emergence dicamba applications should be made when broadleaf weeds are less than 4 inches in height. To manage broadleaf weeds, especially herbicide-resistant waterhemp (emerges throughout the growing season) after June 20th, follow University of Minnesota Extension recommendations on layering of residual herbicides (PDF) such as Dual, Outlook, Warrant, and Valor. Incorporation of layering of residual herbicides in herbicide programs provide residual control of late emerging weeds.
If you do not have herbicide-resistant waterhemp in a field, herbicides from these three sites-of action can be applied:
Growers that have glyphosate-resistant waterhemp may consider using tank-mix of glyphosate with an herbicide from Group 2 or Group 14.
In other generically engineered soybeans, for instance LibertyLink soybeans, applicators can use Liberty (Group 10) herbicide in addition to other labeled herbicides for weed management.
Response: No, dicamba cannot be applied after R1 growth of soybeans, even if it reaches R1 growth stage before June 20, because it is a label requirement.
Response: Dicamba registrants (BASF, DowDuPont, and Monsanto) have prepared training materials and they, or their designees, will conduct training for dicamba applicators that meets the label requirements for 2018 season.
Response: The training will last approximately 2 hours depending upon the number of questions and audience participation.
Response: The training will cover the product label requirements, recordkeeping requirements, weed management practices, buffer requirements and protection of susceptible crops, chemistry, mixing and handling, window of application, equipment preparation and special considerations.
Response: No, the class consists of instruction, review and open question-and-answer sessions.
Response: No, the instructor will maintain a record of those attending the class and will collect the applicator’s name, address, email and other information.
Response: The U.S. EPA and the MDA must approve the continued use of these products after December 2018; requirements may be revisited at that time. For now, applicators must complete the training to use the products in Minnesota in 2018.
Response: No it will not be amended. Pesticide dealers are not required to see the proof of training to sell the dicamba products to certified applicators.
Response: No, a person only needs to attend one training session provided by any of the manufacturers of the new dicamba products, i.e. BASF, DowDuPont, or Monsanto. One annual training satisfies the training requirement for all three products.
Response: The MDA will recognize dicamba training that is based on material prepared by any of the three registrants (BASF, DowDupont, Monsanto). If this same training is provided in a neighboring state, and the MDA is notified by the registrants of the training in advance, MDA will recognize this training. The registrant will be responsible for notifying the MDA of each training and maintaining a database of attendees. The list of approved trainings can be found here.
If you have questions about a privately-held dicamba training (such as after an all-company meeting) given by BASF, DowDupont, or Monsanto, contact MDA.
Response: Yes, the new dicamba products are classified as RUP. A state credential is required to use these products. Additionally, the use of these new dicamba products requires training as mandated by the label for use on all crops listed on the label. These requirements only apply to the new dicamba products described in this document.
Response: Yes, the MDA will recognize training that is based on material prepared by any of the three registrants (BASF, DowDuPont, and Monsanto). If this same training is provided in a neighboring state, and the MDA when notified of the training in advance will recognize this training. The registrant will be responsible for notifying the MDA of training and maintaining a database of attendees. Registrants will make this database available to the MDA.
Response: No, ditches next to an agriculture field do not count toward the buffer distance calculation (see Scenarios 1 and 2).
Scenario 1: Road and ditch are not a part of required buffer.
Figure 1 illustrates if a ditch is located within 110 or 220 feet from the edge of dicamba-tolerant soybeans field, applicators maintain required buffer in the downwind direction from the last treated soybean row to the field edge (red line) as depicted by yellow arrow.
Scenario 2: Road is a part of required buffer but not the ditch.
Figure 2 illustrates that road can be included in required buffer if it falls within 110 or 220 feet distance from the field edge. Buffer distance is measured in the downwind direction from the last treated soybean row to the far edge of the field road (red line) as depicted by yellow arrow.
Response: The MDA encourages the reporting of all dicamba damage. You can report damage to the MDA by submitting a formal complaint.
Additional instructions for submitting a complaint can be found at the same web address. Use the following contact information to report to dicamba damage to manufacturers:
Response: Yes, the new dicamba products are classified as RUPs and as Agricultural Pesticides because of Worker Protection Standard language included on the product labeling. The MDA issues Agricultural Pesticide Dealer Licenses to businesses that offer for sale or sell agricultural pesticides to an end-user for use in the state of Minnesota.
Response: Pesticide dealers may only offer for sale or sell these products to persons that hold a valid Commercial or Noncommercial Pesticide Applicator License or a Private Pesticide Applicator Certification awarded by the MDA. Dealers must keep records of their purchase, sale, and distribution of these products for a period of five years. Additional requirements are detailed on the MDA Pesticide Dealer web page.