Groundwater below the Roof Depot site is contaminated with arsenic that originated from the CMC Site. Three temporary monitoring wells were installed at the Roof Depot site. The concentrations of arsenic in groundwater samples collected from these wells ranged from 29 micrograms per liter (ug/L) to 805 ug/L. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has set 10 ug/L as the Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic in community water systems. The city of Minneapolis obtains its water from the Mississippi River; therefore, arsenic contaminated groundwater under the Roof Depot site does not impact the city’s drinking water supply.
In 2005, the MDH established a Special Well Construction Area (SWCA) for the adjacent CMC Site and surrounding area. The SWCA requires MDH review of all wells proposed to be installed within the SWCA. Water supply wells will not be approved for completion in the unconsolidated deposits or the Platteville or St. Peter formations. Special construction and/or monitoring requirements may be imposed by the MDH for wells, in addition to other restrictions. The SWCA includes the area bounded by East 26th Street on the north, 26th Avenue on the east, Lake Street on the south, and Bloomington Avenue South on the west, within the City of Minneapolis.
In 2005, the MDH established a Special Well Construction Area (SWCA) for the adjacent CMC Site and surrounding area. The SWCA requires MDH review of all wells proposed to be installed within the SWCA. Water supply wells will not be approved for completion in the unconsolidated deposits or the Platteville or St. Peter formations. Special construction and/or monitoring requirements may be imposed by the MDH for wells, in addition to other restrictions. The SWCA includes the area bounded by East 26th Street on the north, 26th Avenue on the east, Lake Street on the south, and Bloomington Avenue South on the west, within the City of Minneapolis.
After remediation of the CMC Site, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) conducted a study which analyzed arsenic concentrations found in urine in children living near the CMC Site. Based on the MDH Minneapolis Children’s Arsenic Study, there was not a relationship between the soil arsenic concentrations found in residential soil and arsenic concentrations in urine in children tested. While no relationship was found, the absence of a correlation between arsenic urine levels and soil arsenic levels in the study does not suggest an absence of risk from soil contamination. The study recommended following public health policies that minimize exposure risks to residents, including continued remediation and prevention of soil ingestion.
For more information and to request a copy of the report please contact:
Minnesota Department of Health
Minnesota Tracking and Biomonitoring Program
651-201-5662
health.biomonitoring@state.mn.us
MN Biomonitoring Past Project
Reference: Minnesota Department of Health. (2009). Minneapolis Children's Arsenic Study: A Biomonitoring Pilot Project.
After remediation of the CMC Site, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) conducted a study which analyzed arsenic concentrations found in urine in children living near the CMC Site. Based on the MDH Minneapolis Children’s Arsenic Study, there was not a relationship between the soil arsenic concentrations found in residential soil and arsenic concentrations in urine in children tested. While no relationship was found, the absence of a correlation between arsenic urine levels and soil arsenic levels in the study does not suggest an absence of risk from soil contamination. The study recommended following public health policies that minimize exposure risks to residents, including continued remediation and prevention of soil ingestion.
For more information and to request a copy of the report please contact:
Minnesota Department of Health
Minnesota Tracking and Biomonitoring Program
651-201-5662
health.biomonitoring@state.mn.us
MN Biomonitoring Past Project
Reference: Minnesota Department of Health. (2009). Minneapolis Children's Arsenic Study: A Biomonitoring Pilot Project.
As part of the city of Minneapolis’ AgVIC investigation, over 80 soil samples were collected from under the Roof Depot building and analyzed for arsenic. Of the samples analyzed, seven exceeded the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s arsenic Soil Reference Value (SRV) of 9 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). The seven samples exceeding the arsenic SRV are scattered around the site and have concentrations ranging from 15.5 to 174 mg/kg. Additional samples collected below these seven samples did not exceed the SRV. Soil with arsenic concentrations exceeding the SRV are limited to the top four feet of soil.
The MDA has approved three proposed excavations within the Roof Depot building footprint to remove arsenic contaminated soil when the building and/or pavement are removed. These excavations would occur to depths of 2-5 feet below ground surface. The MDA estimates that approximately 4,000 cubic yards of arsenic contaminated soil would be removed. After the excavation of these three areas, confirmation samples would be collected from the sidewalls and bases of the excavations to ensure that soil with arsenic concentrations exceeding the SRV is removed. Clean backfill would be used to bring the excavation to grade. Arsenic-contaminated soil would be disposed of at the SKB Environmental Landfill in Rosemount, Minnesota, a permitted industrial waste landfill.
During excavation activities, several dust suppression methods would be used to minimize the generation and dispersion of dust. Contaminated soil would not be disturbed until the demolition of the building and other hardscapes are removed. If excavation does not occur immediately after building materials are removed, clean fill would be placed over contaminated soil. Excavation work would be completed in phases to minimize the amount of soil exposed at any given time. Excavated areas and exposed soils would be misted with water to curb the creation of dust. MDA staff would visit the site during the arsenic-contaminated soil excavation to ensure the process proceeds according to the MDA approved Response Action Plan. The MDA does not have regulatory authority over the demolition of the Roof Depot building; however, dust suppression methods would be used during the demolition of the building. Dust generated during building demolition is not expected to contain arsenic.
Groundwater below the Roof Depot site is contaminated with arsenic that originated from the CMC Site. Three temporary monitoring wells were installed at the Roof Depot site. The concentrations of arsenic in groundwater samples collected from these wells ranged from 29 micrograms per liter (ug/L) to 805 ug/L. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has set 10 ug/L as the Maximum Contaminant Level for arsenic in community water systems. The city of Minneapolis obtains its water from the Mississippi River; therefore, arsenic contaminated groundwater under the Roof Depot site does not impact the city’s drinking water supply.
In 2005, the MDH established a Special Well Construction Area (SWCA) for the adjacent CMC Site and surrounding area. The SWCA requires MDH review of all wells proposed to be installed within the SWCA. Water supply wells will not be approved for completion in the unconsolidated deposits or the Platteville or St. Peter formations. Special construction and/or monitoring requirements may be imposed by the MDH for wells, in addition to other restrictions. The SWCA includes the area bounded by East 26th Street on the north, 26th Avenue on the east, Lake Street on the south, and Bloomington Avenue South on the west, within the City of Minneapolis.
After remediation of the CMC Site, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) conducted a study which analyzed arsenic concentrations found in urine in children living near the CMC Site. Based on the MDH Minneapolis Children’s Arsenic Study, there was not a relationship between the soil arsenic concentrations found in residential soil and arsenic concentrations in urine in children tested. While no relationship was found, the absence of a correlation between arsenic urine levels and soil arsenic levels in the study does not suggest an absence of risk from soil contamination. The study recommended following public health policies that minimize exposure risks to residents, including continued remediation and prevention of soil ingestion.
For more information and to request a copy of the report please contact:
Minnesota Department of Health
Minnesota Tracking and Biomonitoring Program
651-201-5662
health.biomonitoring@state.mn.us
MN Biomonitoring Past Project
Reference: Minnesota Department of Health. (2009). Minneapolis Children's Arsenic Study: A Biomonitoring Pilot Project.
Health Questions
Please contact the Minnesota Department of Health staff listed below with any questions related to health.
Daniel Pena
Health Assessor
651-201-4920
Arsenic Contamination Questions
Please contact the MDA staff listed under "Contact Us".
Summary
Despite drier than normal conditions in portions of the southeast and south west, USDA NASS showed the 2022 crop year was met with corn yields ahead of the previous season here in Minnesota. This same trend was largely reflected in the NMI data, with higher than previous season average yields across treatments in three of the four regions where trials were performed.
Across the state, the average low nitrogen rate treatment was 151 lbs N/ac, which resulted in an average yield of 209 bu/ac. The average high nitrogen rate treatment (typical for the farmer doing the trial) was 188 lbs N/ac, which resulted in an average yield of 214 bu/ac. Of the 48 individual trial locations, 32 (67%) showed a no significant difference between resulting treatment yields – meaning reducing the N application rate did not negatively impact yield.
The most popular fertilizer product across the state was urea or urea with other products (e.g., ammonium sulfate) applied in the same time window. That said, anhydrous ammonia was the primary N source on the largest number of trials in the Southwestern region (33% of trials), and urea ammonium nitrate (UAN – 28%) was the primary nitrogen source on the largest number of trials in the South Central region (43% of trials).
Full Report
